Determining if patients will respond to targeted therapy
Assessing microsatellite instability for immunotherapy decisions
This test uses targeted next-generation sequencing to determine microsatellite instability status and to evaluate for somatic mutations within the BAP1, BRAF, CDKN2A, CTNNB1, EIF1AX, GNA11, GNAQ, HRAS, KIT, KRAS, MAP2K1, MAP2K2, NF1, NRAS, SF3B1, TERT-promoter, and TP53 genes. See Targeted Genes and Methodology Details for MayoComplete Melanoma Panel for details regarding the targeted gene regions evaluated by this test.
This test is performed to evaluate for somatic mutations within solid tumor samples. It does not assess for germline alterations within the genes listed.
Evaluates formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor, or cytology slides from patients with melanoma for gene mutations to identify candidates for targeted therapy.
Microsatellite instability (MSI) status is also determined (microsatellite stable, MSI-High) as part of this test and is often clinically actionable for determining the efficacy of immunotherapy in solid tumors.
Test Id | Reporting Name | Available Separately | Always Performed |
---|---|---|---|
SLIRV | Slide Review in MG | No | Yes |
When this test is ordered, slide review will always be performed at an additional charge.
Sequence Capture and Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS)
BRAF
BRAF V600
BRAF V600E
BRAF V600K
GNA11
GNAQ
GST11
GST13
GST17
KIT
MAP2K1
MAP2K2
MSI
Microsatellite Instability
Melanoma
Next Gen Sequencing Test
NGS
NRAS
Oncology Panel
TERT
TERT Promoter
TP53
Tumor Panel
Mayo Complete
When this test is ordered, slide review will always be performed at an additional charge.
Varies
Multiple oncology (cancer) gene panels are available. For more information see Hematology, Oncology, and Hereditary Test Selection Guide.
A pathology report (final or preliminary), at minimum containing the following information, must accompany specimen for testing to be performed:
1. Patient name
2. Block number-must be on all blocks, slides, and paperwork (can be handwritten on the paperwork)
3. Tissue collection date
4. Source of the tissue
This assay requires at least 20% tumor nuclei.
-Preferred amount of tumor area with sufficient percent tumor nuclei: tissue 216 mm(2)
-Minimum amount of tumor area: tissue 36 mm(2)
-These amounts are cumulative over up to 10 unstained slides and must have adequate percent tumor nuclei
-Tissue fixation: 10% neutral buffered formalin, not decalcified
-For specimen preparation guidance, see Tissue Requirements for Solid Tumor Next-Generation Sequencing. In this document, the sizes are given as 4 mm x 4 mm x 10 slides as preferred: approximate/equivalent to 144 mm(2) and the minimum as 3 mm x 1 mm x 10 slides: approximate/equivalent to 36 mm(2).
Preferred:
Specimen Type: Tissue block
Collection Instructions: Submit a formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue block with acceptable amount of tumor tissue.
Acceptable:
Specimen Type: Tissue slides
Slides: 1 Stained and 10 unstained
Collection Instructions: Submit 1 slide stained with hematoxylin and eosin and 10 unstained, nonbaked slides with 5-micron thick sections of the tumor tissue.
Note: The total amount of required tumor nuclei can be obtained by scraping up to 10 slides from the same block.
Additional Information: Unused unstained slides will not be returned.
Specimen Type: Cytology slides (direct smears or ThinPrep)
Slides: 1 to 3 Slides
Collection Instructions: Submit 1 to 3 slides stained and coverslipped with a preferred total of 5000 nucleated cells, or a minimum of at least 3000 nucleated cells.
Note: Glass coverslips are preferred; plastic coverslips are acceptable but will result in longer turnaround times.
Additional Information: Cytology slides will not be returned
If not ordering electronically, complete, print, and send an Oncology Test Request (T729) with the specimen.
See Specimen Required
Specimens that have been decalcified (all methods) Specimens that have not been formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded, except for cytology slides Extracted nucleic acid (DNA/RNA) | Reject |
Specimen Type | Temperature | Time | Special Container |
---|---|---|---|
Varies | Ambient (preferred) | ||
Refrigerated |
Determining if patients will respond to targeted therapy
Assessing microsatellite instability for immunotherapy decisions
This test uses targeted next-generation sequencing to determine microsatellite instability status and to evaluate for somatic mutations within the BAP1, BRAF, CDKN2A, CTNNB1, EIF1AX, GNA11, GNAQ, HRAS, KIT, KRAS, MAP2K1, MAP2K2, NF1, NRAS, SF3B1, TERT-promoter, and TP53 genes. See Targeted Genes and Methodology Details for MayoComplete Melanoma Panel for details regarding the targeted gene regions evaluated by this test.
This test is performed to evaluate for somatic mutations within solid tumor samples. It does not assess for germline alterations within the genes listed.
When this test is ordered, slide review will always be performed at an additional charge.
Targeted cancer therapies are defined as antibody or small molecule drugs that block the growth and spread of cancer by interfering with specific cell molecules involved in tumor growth and progression. Multiple targeted therapies have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for treatment of specific cancers. Molecular genetic profiling is often needed to identify targets amenable to targeted therapies and to minimize treatment costs and therapy-associated risks. Microsatellite instability status is an important biomarker for determining effective immunotherapeutic treatment options for patients with solid tumors.
Next-generation sequencing has recently emerged as an accurate, cost-effective method to identify mutations across numerous genes known to be associated with response or resistance to specific targeted therapies.
This test is a single assay that uses formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue or cytology specimens to assess for common mutations in the following genes known to be associated with melanoma: BAP1, BRAF, CDKN2A, CTNNB1, EIF1AX, GNA11, GNAQ, HRAS, KIT, KRAS, MAP2K1, MAP2K2, NF1, NRAS, SF3B1, TERT promoter, and TP53. The results of this test can be useful for assessing prognosis and guiding treatment of individuals with melanoma.
An interpretive report will be provided.
The interpretation of molecular biomarker analysis includes an overview of the results and the associated diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic implications.
This test cannot differentiate between somatic and germline alterations. Additional testing may be necessary to clarify the significance of results if there is a potential hereditary risk.
DNA variants of uncertain significance may be identified.
A negative result does not rule out the presence of a variant that may be present below the limits of detection of this assay. The analytical sensitivity of this assay for sequence reportable alterations is 5% mutant allele frequency with a minimum coverage of 500X in a sample with 20% or more tumor content.
Point mutations and small deletion-insertion mutations will be detected in the BAP1, BRAF, CDKN2A, CTNNB1, EIF1AX, GNA11, GNAQ, HRAS, KIT, KRAS, MAP2K1, MAP2K2, NF1, NRAS, SF3B1, TERT promoter, and TP53 genes. This test may detect single exon deletions but does not detect multiexon deletions, duplications, or genomic copy number variants.
Variant allele frequency (VAF) is the percentage of sequencing reads supporting a specific variant divided by the total sequencing reads at that position. In somatic testing, VAF should be interpreted in the context of several factors including, but not limited to, tumor purity/heterogeneity/copy number status (ploidy, gains/losses, loss of heterozygosity) and sequencing artifact/misalignment. (1,2)
Rare polymorphisms may be present that could lead to false-negative or false-positive results.
The presence or absence of a variant may not be predictive of response to therapy in all patients.
Test results should be interpreted in the context of clinical, tumor sampling, histopathological, and other laboratory data. If results obtained do not match other clinical or laboratory findings, contact the laboratory for discussion. Misinterpretation of results may occur if the information provided is inaccurate or incomplete.
Reliable results are dependent on adequate specimen collection and processing. This test has been validated on cytology slides and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues; other types of fixatives are discouraged. Improper treatment of tissues, such as decalcification, may cause polymerase chain reaction failure.
Performance Characteristics:
The limit of detection for calling a somatic variant (single nucleotide variants [SNV] and deletions-insertions [delins, formerly indels]) is 5% variant allele frequency if there is at least 500x deduplicated coverage.
Verification studies demonstrated concordance between this test and the reference method for detection of SNV and delins is 99.7% (699/701) and 96.6% (226/234), respectively. Concordance for the detection of delins was 98.9% (186/188) in variants 1 to 10 base pairs (bp) in size, 95.8% (23/24) in variants 11 to 50 bp in size, and 88.9% (8/9) in variants 51 to 200 bp in size.
Microsatellite instability (MSI) evaluation is accurate at a tumor purity of at least 10% for colorectal tumors and 20% for other tumor types. During verification studies, 98% (200/204) concordance for MSI status was observed between this test and the reference method.
1. Strom SP. Current practices and guidelines for clinical next-generation sequencing oncology testing. Cancer Biol Med. 2016;13(1):3-11. doi:10.28092/j.issn.2095-3941.2016.0004
2. Spurr L, Li M, Alomran N, et al. Systematic pan-cancer analysis of somatic allele frequency. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):7735. Published 2018 May 16. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-25462-0
3. US Food and Drug Administration (FDA): Table of Pharmacogenomic Biomarkers in Drug Labeling. FDA; Updated August 11, 2022, Accessed July 31, 2023. Available at www.fda.gov/drugs/science-and-research-drugs/table-pharmacogenomic-biomarkers-drug-labeling
4. Guo W, Wang H, Li Chunying. Signal pathways of melanoma and targeted therapy. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021:6(1):424
5. Marcus L, Lemery SJ, Keegan P, Pazdur R. FDA approval summary: Pembrolizumab for the treatment of microsatellite instability-high solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25(13):3753-3758. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-4070
6. Seedor RS, Orloff M, Sato T. Genetic landscape and emerging therapies in uveal melanoma, Cancers (Basel). 2021;13(21):5503
Next-generation sequencing is performed to determine microsatellite instability status and evaluate the presence of a mutation in targeted regions of the BAP1, BRAF, CDKN2A, CTNNB1, EIF1AX, GNA11, GNAQ, HRAS, KIT, KRAS, MAP2K1, MAP2K2, NF1, NRAS, SF3B1, TERT-promoter, and TP53 genes. See Targeted Genes and Methodology Details for MayoComplete Melanoma Panel for details regarding the targeted gene regions evaluated by this test.(Unpublished Mayo method)
A pathology review and macro dissection to enrich for tumor cells are performed prior to slide scraping.
Monday through Friday
This test was developed and its performance characteristics determined by Mayo Clinic in a manner consistent with CLIA requirements. It has not been cleared or approved by the US Food and Drug Administration.
88381-Microdissection, manual
81457
Test Id | Test Order Name | Order LOINC Value |
---|---|---|
MCMLN | MayoComplete Melanoma Panel | 73977-1 |
Result Id | Test Result Name |
Result LOINC Value
Applies only to results expressed in units of measure originally reported by the performing laboratory. These values do not apply to results that are converted to other units of measure.
|
---|---|---|
617881 | Result | 82939-0 |
617882 | Interpretation | 69047-9 |
617883 | Additional Information | 48767-8 |
617884 | Specimen | 31208-2 |
617885 | Tissue ID | 80398-1 |
617886 | Method | 85069-3 |
617887 | Disclaimer | 62364-5 |
617888 | Released By | 18771-6 |
Change Type | Effective Date |
---|---|
File Definition - Result ID | 2023-04-27 |